Comparing and Evaluation
The shadows are brighter compared
to the computer screen. The original image shows different shades of black but
in the print it looks like the record blends in with the black background. The
paper quality of this image is very weak and not durable at all meaning that
you get marks on the image which makes it look worse. Compared to the image on
screen this print looks like a completely different image.
This is the ProAm print of my
image. In comparison to the laser print and computer screen this is by far the
best version. The sharpness quality of this print is much better than the laser
print and is almost identical to the computer screened version.
This is my laser
printed version of my print. The quality of this print compared to my computer
screen is at a lower quality, the original image compared to this print is very
different because when printed out on A3 the image looks like it has been
stretched out. The highlights of this
image are of a decent quality but do not show all of them. With the shadows as
well, as you can see on my computer screen the shadows are very visible but
when printed out the shadows are darker. The paper quality of this image is terrible
because the ink seeps through the paper and is not very durable.
This is my ProAm print of my
original album cover, In comparison to the laser print this is the best print
of both. The quality of this paper is far better because it is durable and the
quality of the image looks almost identical to my original image on my
computer. The highlights of this image are much better than the laser print and
the shadows have also improved a lot more on this print. In conclusion compared to the laser print
this ProAm print is much better.
This is my original image from my
computer screen. This is how it’s supposed to look when being printed out at
ProAm and printed.
This is my laser printed version of
my album cover. The quality of this print compared to the computer screen is
worse, the background of the image specifically because it looks more out of
focus than it actually is. The highlights are also represented worse because
the light that reflects off this record is much brighter than the
original.
This is the ProAm print of my
image. In comparison to the laser print and computer screen this is by far the
best version. The sharpness quality of this print is much better than the laser
print and is almost identical to the computer screened version.
The highlights and shadows show
much more clearly than the laser print; and also shows the reflection of the
light perfectly. Compared to the laser print the paper quality is better
because it is more durable although due to its glossy finish can show finger
prints easily. In conclusion this is the best print and in comparison to the
computer screen it looks the exact same.
This is my original image from my computer;
this is how it’s supposed to look when being printed out at ProAm and when
using the laser printer.
This is my laser
printed version of my print. The quality of this print compared to my computer
screen is at a lower quality, the original image compared to this print is very
different because when printed out on A3 the image looks like it has been
stretched out. The highlights of this
image are of a decent quality but do not show all of them. With the shadows as
well, as you can see on my computer screen the shadows are very visible but
when printed out the shadows are darker. The paper quality of this image is terrible
because the ink seeps through the paper and is not very durable. 
This is my ProAm print of my
original album cover, In comparison to the laser print this is the best print
of both. The quality of this paper is far better because it is durable and the
quality of the image looks almost identical to my original image on my
computer. The highlights of this image are much better than the laser print and
the shadows have also improved a lot more on this print. In conclusion compared to the laser print
this ProAm print is much better.
No comments:
Post a Comment